Arizona Uses Foreign Drug in Execution of Jeffrey Landrigan With U.S. Supreme Court Okay

Two nights ago (on Tuesday), Arizona executed Jeffrey Landrigan by lethal injection after the United States Supreme Court (5-4) okayed going forward, even though there is a national shortage of sodium thiopental, one of the three drugs used in the lethal injection "cocktail" that is used to kill the condemned man. 

Sodium thiopental works as an anesthetic, preventing pain and inducing sleep.  Legally, that's important because the federal constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, right?

Problem is, as we've written about before, there's a shortage of sodium thiopental in this country - and some states are stopping their executions because they don't have the drug to use.  Arizona's answer to the shortage?  Buy overseas.

Jeff Landrigan's lawyers sought relief from the U.S. Supreme Court under the argument that the foreign source meant that the drug might or might not meet American drug standards and therefore, only domestic or federally approved drugs should be used in executions. 

The High Court disagreed, opining that "...[t]here is no evidence in the record to suggest that the drug obtained from a foreign source is unsafe ... speculation cannot substitute for evidence that the use of the drug is 'sure or very likely to cause serious illness and needless suffering.'"  (Read the Order here.)

So, Arizona apparently used a British drug to execute Jeffrey Landrigan on Tuesday.  This would be the first execution on American soil using a foreign drug as a means of execution. 

What happens next?  Texas crosses to a border town for a quick batch of knock-out drugs when it runs out of sodium thiopental in a couple of months?   

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Joachim - October 29, 2010 5:38 PM


maybe I don't understand the "origin-issue" due to the fact that I'm a foreign national; but I think that it doesn't matter where's the drug from. Jeffrey Landrigan is executed and hence he's dead - that's a fact.

Since the Supremes "bazed" lethal injection (or should I say: they "bazed" the 8th amendment?) we abolitionists have only one avenue (battlefield!?) - the death penalty itself. To be honest I don't have a solution for this catch-22 but I'm convinced that issues like "arbitrariness", "origin of the drug" and even "innocence" are secondy areas of conflict.



Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.

Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...