At its conference last week (on May 10, 2012), the United States Supreme Court did what it always does: confers on petitions placed before it, and decides if they should be granted.  If you’re interested, you can follow this process week after week as it is live-blogged over at scotusblog.com.

Of particular interest, the case

The jury has found Joshua Fulgham guilty of first degree murder (see earlier posts for details of the case).  

Beginning today, Terry Lenamon and the defense team will be arguing Florida mitigating factors and how their application should prevent Fulgham being sentenced to the death penalty.

For details on mitigating factors, see our earlier post

One of the great things about the internet is its ability to educate and inform, and here’s yet another example of that:  several excellent articles discussing aspects of the death penalty, and specifically, death penalty defense, have appeared this month.

All, available for free, online.  Please consider reading the following:

Defendant remorse, need for affect,

Worth your time to read, this law review article just published by the Virginia Law Review in a continuing discussion of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as it relates to "cruel and unusual" punishment and the death penalty — was the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause originally meant to prohibit excessive punishments as

The reality that individuals suffering from severe mental illness set on Death Rows all across the country today should not even be the subject for debate – the reality is too obvious.  Whether they were mentally ill at the time of the crime for which they face a sentence of death is one issue.  Whether